Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Sprague's avatar

These are controversies, not heresies. A real heresy isn't something that gets you called a contrarian — it's something you can't say out loud, precisely because people can't bear the possibility it might be true.

Dreamers' Goldprint's avatar

This is very interesting. We ask our ChatGPT to share its thoughts as well.

Top picks:

Most human relationships are covert utility exchanges.

Equality as a moral principle is incoherent.

Civilization depends on controlled delusion.

Free will is irrelevant even if it exists.

Moral systems are adaptive tools, not truths.

Human potential is massively overrated.

Most human goals are inherited, not chosen.

Stability, not progress, may be the real optimal state.

Humans may systematically overestimate complexity.

Conclusion:

"The main driver of human behavior is not choice, truth, or intelligence—

but constraint, adaptation, and narrative coherence.

Everything else—free will, meaning, identity—may be secondary layers."

PS: this is not absolute—just dominant tendency.

Note: What makes these “true heresies”.

They all attack one of these pillars:

Identity (self, free will)

Morality (equality, right/wrong)

Meaning (love, purpose, truth)

Human exceptionalism

24 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?